NS
Nina Interviewer
Priya is stronger at systems tradeoffs; Mateo has deeper enterprise buying experience.
Finalist Comparison
Compare the same evidence. Leave with a human-owned selection.
Finalists stay attached to the same frozen criteria, evidence standard, and unresolved gaps until the hiring team makes the call.
Just talk. BigWow keeps up. No special commands or constant note-taking. Have the conversation you were already going to have.
Same scorecard · two finalists Evidence comparison
Material finalist tradeoff Different strengths Compared against the same frozen criteria
JM
Jordan Hiring manager
“Select Priya, keep Mateo as backup, and complete Priya’s references Friday.”
Priya selected Confirmed by Jordan ✓
Finalist selection ✓
Priya selected Selected finalist Priya Shah Confirmed by Jordan
Follow-up Complete reference checks Lee · Friday
Same scorecard · two finalists→Confirmed by Jordan
How the template helps
One scorecard. Candidate-specific evidence. No hidden AI ranking.
The panel compares the slate consistently without blending distinct assessments into a synthetic score.
What the team leaves with
A selection record the hiring team can defend.
The selected finalist, backup path, criterion evidence, remaining gaps, and follow-ups stay reviewable.
Run a finalist comparisonProduct director finalists Selection record
Priya selectedConfirmed outcome Select Priya; retain Mateo as backup
Consistent scorecard · explicit tradeoffs · one reference follow-up
Selected finalist Confirmed
Priya Shah Confirmed by Jordan
Criterion evidence and rationale attachedFollow-up Confirmed
Complete reference checks Lee · Friday
Decision-changing evidence question attached